77
submitted 2 days ago by stln@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world

Greg Mello, director of the Los Alamos Study Group, which studies the US nuclear arsenal, stated that none of the current US or other countries' missile defense systems are capable of countering Russian non-ballistic nuclear weapons.

According to him, the US initiative to create the Golden Dome system is technically unfeasible. Mello noted that Russia possesses weapons such as the Poseidon underwater drone, hypersonic missiles, and cruise missiles, which are specifically designed to overcome missile defense systems.

He emphasized that instead of fanciful projects like Golden Dome, real arms control measures are needed to ensure mutual security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

the Iron Dome, which is what trump wants to install (and calls the Golden Dome) was never meant to stop ICCBM missiles. It's a system designed to catch the relatively short ranged rockets being used by Hamas and other missiles.

Trump is a moron.

To put the system into perspective, Israel has about 8,500 square miles of landmass. the US? 3.2 million.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

It's actually so much worse than that, as the article explains.

Iron Dome was the inspiration, but with Golden Dome what they're planning is space based interception. It's Reagan's Star Wars project back from the dead.

The problem with this is two fold; no known system in the world can reliably intercept ICBMs, and doing so from space is ludicrously expensive. It costs, in effect, about ten times as much to shoot down one ICBM as it does to build an launch one, meaning that a peer adversary can just build more missiles and flood the system. To stop even a Hundred ICBMs would cost hundreds of billions of dollars. China has six hundred.

Basically, like so much of what Trump spends money on, it will amount to a very expensive but completely useless toy.

[-] rainwall@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

600 known nuclear ICBMs. They can probably mass produce just the missiles to flood the system and let the actual nukes through.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They probably* don’t even have launch vehicles for the warheads they do have. That particular branch of their military isnextremely corrupt, with people selling everything they could off on the black market. Including, apparently, launch fuel.

I would find it surprising if they could mass produce them in any meaningful quantity.

(*not something I’m willing to bet on, to be clear. This is one of those plan for the worst case. The worst case is probably they sold off a portion of warheads to the highest bidder a la Sum of All Fears but the rest are all operational.)

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Who's lobbing short range missiles at USA?

[-] jellygoose@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Looks like we just found our new head of the CIA boys! Tell us more about these Canadians.

[-] blicky_blank@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

The Mexicans obviously

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Who is lobbing nukes?

It’s the same people. (No one.)

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

New cartel smuggling idea? /s

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50144 readers
2103 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS