55
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
37189 readers
162 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not necessarily, no. Content warnings were implemented in Mastodon specifically as
summaryplussensitive=true. Perhaps not originally, but that is enforced now (all CW'd posts from Mastodon are marked sensitive). Might be Mastodon will CW notes that don't havesensitive, out of caution, but this doesn't apply to non-Notes.So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW'd by Mastodon currently.
I know, I was just saying that it prevents a non-Note from being CW'd, as the
summeryis used as the post's content.I suppose, although in that scenario theoretically one could add
as:sensitiveto mark the status as CW'd? I don't think CW logic is even run for non-Notes at the moment, though I could be mistaken.Masto interprets a
Noteset asas:sensitivewithout asummaryto mean 'blur any media attached, but don't collapse the text content'. I believe the same is true for non-Notes, but obviously without thesummary= CW logic.