418
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
418 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
41716 readers
458 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
You compared the Cloudflare situation to "taking money from Google" and added that due to Ladybird taking money from Cloudflare, they're "not challenging the status quo".
Ladybird being a browser has absolutely no bearing on webhosting and the only status quo it can challenge is in the browser market. Which implies that you think Cloudflare has something to do with the browser market.
Again: what does Cloudflare have to do with the browser market...?
And you don't think that financing a third party browser to break the duopoly is "doing more"?
This is like saying "the duopoly that reigns the water is Maersk and Smartwater", two companies that do completely different things that just happen to be related to water...
Mate, we're talking about the BROWSER MARKET.
Even assuming Ladybird somehow gains 100% of that market, completely kicking out anything Chromium related, it has ZERO bearing on who people choose for their host! Cloudflare currently has around 20% of that market, and if Ladybird - today - goes up to 100% share of the browser market, Cloudflare will still hold 20% of hosting!
You're talking about some overarching Internet revolution, while the thread is about a single aspect of how people reach the Internet!
Google's Chrome used to be only about 60% compliant with W3C guidelines. They still became the de-facto default browser and so the guidelines changed to better match Chrome's interpretation.
It's already happened when Microsoft released the first version of Edge. Google killed it by making it "incompatible" with its services.
Cloudflare? By giving money to a project aiming at breaking up the duopoly...?