33
submitted 1 week ago by als to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

30 motions on Gaza blocked from being debated at Labour’s conference in a week’s time. A genocide is taking place but Labour members are not being allowed to even discuss what should be the government’s response. Bureaucratic control is now out of control.

The Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC) met yesterday and decided to rule out more than 30 motions submitted by constituency Labour Partys (CLPs) and affiliated organisations ahead of the party conference in Liverpool which begins on Sunday 28th September. Every motion on Palestine was ruled out of order by the CAC.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No she threatened as did Corbyns team. First.

The sorta crap you see in disagreements.

Edit: I'll add. Anyone who has watched Labour over the last 40 years. This is hardly a rare response to political arguments.

Tories do it as well. But do tend to be better at keeping internal arguments out of the media. I'm not so sure that is a positive trait.

Important to note. ZS and JC are not the official leaders of this new party. They are leading the founding team. And are again working together having dropped all legal threats.

Members get to vote on leadership in November. Assuming all goes as the plan declares. Both have indicated they will run. ZS still wants to lead with JC as a team. But both fully commit to a membership controlled party. And declare it up to the members to choose the leadership.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4315 readers
153 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS