404
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

The wildest part of this to me is the politicians exempting themselves. It may be different in Europe, but in the US, the politicians are often the child predators this legislation claims to protect against.

The politicians claim "professional secrecy", but shouldn't you be increasingly auditable the more power you are given. Private individuals should have an expectation of privacy. Politicians, and those with power and influence should live in the open to protect from abuses of that power.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is definitely an amount of valid secrecy in positions of power, half of politics would collapse if they couldnt corroborate their eggs in order in their coop. With regards to authority that defines what should be publicly auditable, it's rather a chicken and egg situation.

Before I hatch any more puns, generally politician's privacy at work, or anything related to their position << civilian privacy should be definitely the case. I do like the idea.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
404 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

75670 readers
2958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS