Nvidia 980 Ti 6GB, or AMD RX Vega 64 8GB? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by Phobos@kbin.social to c/linux_gaming@kbin.social

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have been offered a choice between these two cards, and I'm not sure which one will perform better in linux at this point. If it was Windows I would just go with the Nvidia and call it a day, but the driver situation on Linux has me leaning towards AMD. Is the AMD the right choice?

I'm using the Garuda distro.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Btw, if you ever need to compare GPUs on Linux, use https://openbenchmarking.org/vs/Graphics/

https://openbenchmarking.org/vs/Graphics/AMD+Radeon+RX+64,NVIDIA+GeForce+GTX+980+Ti

[-] tal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The performance between the two -- VRAM aside -- is apparently significantly closer on Windows than in Linux, which I assume why OP is asking.

https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/3218vs3808/GeForce-GTX-980-Ti-vs-Radeon-RX-Vega-64

The AMD card tends to slightly pull ahead on Windows too, but it's a much closer thing there.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In the meta-review at launch of the V64, it was 95-98% of a 1080:

https://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/launch-analyse-amd-radeon-rx-vega/launch-analyse-amd-radeon-rx-vega-seite-2 (German but the table is self-explanatory)

980 ti was about 7% behind a 1070 at its launch; over 20% behind a 1080: https://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/launch-analyse-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070/launch-analyse-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-seite-2

I'm leaning towards declaring PassMark's GPU bench not being a very representative benchmark.

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

A very safe assumption.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023

7 points (100.0% liked)

GNU/Linux Gaming on Kbin

13 readers

2 users here now

A community for gaming on the GNU/Linux distros.

founded 1 year ago