103
Proton Mail Suspended Journalist Accounts at Request of Cybersecurity Agency (theintercept.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] neuracnu 46 points 2 weeks ago

The author omitted the complete statement from Reddit:

Hi everyone,

No, Proton did not knowingly block journalists’ email accounts. Our support for journalists and those working in the public interest has been demonstrated time and again through actions, not just words.

In this case, we were alerted by a CERT that certain accounts were being misused by hackers in violation of Proton’s Terms of Service. This led to a cluster of accounts being disabled.

Because of our zero-access architecture, we cannot see the content of accounts and therefore cannot always know when anti-abuse measures may inadvertently affect legitimate activism.

Our team has reviewed these cases individually to determine if any can be restored. We have now reinstated 2 accounts, but there are other accounts we cannot reinstate due to clear ToS violations.

Regarding Phrack’s claim on contacting our legal team 8 times: this is not true. We have only received two emails to our legal team inbox, last one on Sep 6 with a 48-hour deadline. This is unrealistic for a company the size of Proton, especially since the message was sent to our legal team inbox on a Saturday, rather than through the proper customer support channels.

The situation has unfortunately been blown out of proportion without giving us a fair chance to respond to the initial outreach.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 18 points 2 weeks ago

From what I've seen and read, Proton sit on their thumbs until Phrack used their twitter to publicly complain to Proton, and the CEO being afraid of bad advertising, forced its company to do something.

In reality, Proton never explained why it took so long to reinstate the accounts, why the accounts were blocked in the first place (beyond the ambiguity of ToS violation) nor which CERT had abused their authority.

Dante (the Proton support guy) told Saber that their account “has been disabled as a result of a direct connection to an account that was taken down due to violations of our terms and conditions while being used in a malicious manner.” Dante also provided a link to Proton’s terms of service, going on to state, “We have clearly indicated that any account used for unauthorized activities, will be sanctioned accordingly.” The response concluded by stating, “We consider that allowing access to your account will cause further damage to our service, therefore we will keep the account suspended.”

So the journalist didn't get any chance of appeal nor any clarification beyond "here's a list of no-nos, guess which want I think you did".

I'm very disappointed in Proton.

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

If you've never had to contact Proton support, 2-5 business days just to get someone to say "hello, we started a ticket" is absolutely normal from my experience. Once they've opened the conversion, it goes faster, but anyone is guaranteed a wait of days.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
103 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

3916 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
fxomt@piefed.social