864
It really did
(reddthat.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
864 points (100.0% liked)
aww
25600 readers
46 users here now
A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.
AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about
- No racism or bigotry.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but thatdoes not provide the right to personally insult others.
- No SPAM posting.
- No trolling of others.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I’m sorry to say that a AI could recreate that look in a flash. And within 5 years you could have a completely consistent, feature length film done in that look.
Let’s not minimize the threat. If we want to avoid being replaced by computers, it’s now the fight has to be had.
Fatal mistake.
There is a venn diagram of anti ai including both people who believe ai is incapable of producing value and people who believe it will take their jobs,
But they do not mix nor understand how the other exists.
I’m not really sure if your comment is a reaction against my statement, in support of my statement ir adding further nuance to my statement.
I certainly believe AI is capable of producing value. I certainly believe AI will take people’s jobs. Exactly because it is able to produce value.
I’ve seen both things first thing, many times, already.
My statement was meant to highlight that it is exactly because it is producing value and taking people’s jobs that we ought to have a debate about whether it should and who it will benefit (and who will lose out) from that great replacement.
Right now, all I see is a further concentration of wealth built on the backs of thousands of years of human creativity. It’s the ultimate rent seeking.
Its part nuance part friendly warning because your attempt to rally people is easy to be misunderstood.
In the first part you try to convince that ai will be capable of producing quality.
In the second part you try to rally against the threat of ai taking jobs but the people you just adressed don’t believe this is going to be a problem.