864
It really did
(reddthat.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
864 points (100.0% liked)
aww
25545 readers
221 users here now
A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.
AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about
- No racism or bigotry.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but thatdoes not provide the right to personally insult others.
- No SPAM posting.
- No trolling of others.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So how many frames is this, do we think, just for this clip...
While true, with hand drawn animation it's slightly different as not every frame is drawn (usually). Disney films looked so good because they were done "on the two's" instead of the industry standard of "on the three's" - meaning that Disney films had a drawn frame for every 2 fps instead of every 3, or 12 drawn frames per second instead of the normal 8. Your brain interpolates the rest of the between frames, but this is why Disney looks so much more smooth.
Another great example is Akira, which was done on the 1's and 2's. That it has 12 to 24 hand drawn frames per second makes the visual quality difference really visible when compared to other movies.
24fps, nearly 3 seconds long, so somewhere near 72 frames total, BUT... these animations were done on 2's - meaning every other frame. https://businessofanimation.com/why-animation-studios-are-animating-on-2s/