418
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago

So I know what to look for in the future for people to avoid, the glasses apparently look like this:

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago

And putting Ray Ban on the "never buy a fucking thing from" list.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

You should go up the chain and put the parent company of the parent company and all the related properties there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EssilorLuxottica

[-] Corn@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago

That's 99% of eyeglasses in the US and Canada

[-] MOCVD@mander.xyz 13 points 2 days ago

Not Costco tho!

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Ray Ban's parent company is going to have AI glasses from all of the companies they own. I was boycotting Ray Ban up until I learned that it's really fucking difficult to find prescription sunglasses big enough for my giant head that can accommodate my very strong prescription and Ray Ban had the only pair that I could find.

[-] Mellibird@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 2 days ago

Also throwing out Zenni as an option. I'm on the verge of coke bottle sized lenses and can find many frames from them.

[-] pezhore@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

Have you tried Warby Parker? I've been using them for prescription sunglasses for years with decent success and I'm blind as a bar without lenses.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Thats the wayfarer model, you'll never be able to tell, theyre too common

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You're missing the details:

Regular wayfarer on the left has the small oval (sometimes chrome) accent. AI wayfarer on the right as the round black camera lenses.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

You're going up close to every person you see with wayfarers to check the corner for a small oval? The details are too small to matter from a distance.That's what I'm trying to say.

There will likely be other models or brands where you can't even rely on the distinction you're trying to make here.

It's looking bleak.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You’re going up close to every person you see with wayfarers to check the corner for a small oval? The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

No. If I'm walking up to someone intending to interact with them, that is close enough to see the lenses. Upon identifying those, I will elect instead to not interact with that person and keep on walking by.

The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I'm going to refuse to talk to people unless they take them off and shut them down first.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I won't even give them the option to take them off. If I see someone wearing them I had intended to interact with, I'll keep on walking by and ignore the person.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
418 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

3969 readers
496 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS