614
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 109 points 1 week ago

The point isn't to get supplies to Gaza, it's to put eyeballs on the fact that Israel is preventing supplies from getting into Gaza.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

So alleviating their suffering isn't the objective, rather to point out that they are suffering?

[-] bingrazer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

I think it’s more that one delivery is a drop in the bucket while achieving a constant stream of deliveries (e.g. the public puts enough pressure on their respective governments) could meaningfully address the problem

[-] FishFace@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

The objective is to draw attention to the famine that Israel is causing by publicising how Israel blocks the entry of aid with a very tangible example.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

They're going to get stopped either way. A flotilla of 27 civilian ships isn't sneaking past one of the most advanced, heavily armed navies in the world, no matter how "sneaky" they try to be.

At least this way they're on record for stopping the delivery.

[-] cuerdo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

if they try to sneak for sure they are getting killed

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

They just don't expect to be allowed through. If they are, great! Then they'd do this again with an even bigger flotilla, and keep helping people as long as they're allowed to.

However, what they expect to happen is that they'll be stopped. So they're making sure they're positioned to take full advantage of that, too.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I understand it better now, clearly there are others that didn't like my question. I guess there are 'stupid' questions to ask.

But regardless, the take for me is that they are taking more a 'martyrdom' sort of approach, which I completely respect.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

To point out its purposeful starvation. Israel claims they don’t have to,provide aid, it’s a war. This points out the hypocrisy that Israel are preventing peaceful aid. Israel are using hunger and famine as a weapon of war, to eliminate a people. Aka genocide and war crimes,

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Everybody know that israel claims are BS. All leaders now that the occupying force has the obligation to provide necessities to the occupied

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Yer they still receive support and they still block aid. This is to make it clear to those that don't know, or that think Israel is within its rights to do so.

[-] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 1 week ago
[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

So alleviating their suffering isn't the objective

I'm surprised a .ml account is saying this.

Still, I'm curious if they have a real distribution plan should they make it through. I don't imaging desperate people are going to make an orderly line, nor that the IDF will just watch it happen.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

While some people defend the Russian invasion of Ukraine in ML, I have never seen comments as disturbing as those on .world that defend Israel unconditionally and blame Hamas for the genocide. Some even go so far as to claim that Palestinians do not exist, and that the entire land belongs to Jews because God supposedly gave it to them, or based on other stupid ancestral arguments.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Good ole nakba denial

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Im on Lemmy a fair amount, but I've not seen that on .world. Still wouldn't surprise me given its one of the biggest instance.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I've seen this kind of stereotyping around - what's this about different attributes associated with different Lemmy domains? I just made a random one.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Tankie instance, but more relevant one that has a strong dislike of pragmatism when discussing leftist issues.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a tankie instance?? I just saw that the description was lemmy.ml, I took it as to mean the most 'generic' one. (Given that it is 'lemmy') Where was this extra description?

Also I thought everyone was free to just choose whichever and there was no difference in the kind of accessibility or privilege to choosing one over another?

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The .ml stands for Marxist Leninist. Not really, but that's how they use it. It is a generic instance, but it does have that reputation.

I love their passion for issues, but their stubborn unpractical approach to solutions is frustrating.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Whaaat? Is there a list of other domains and what political agendas they stand for? Or what's a completely politically neutered instance?

Also there definitely was nothing like that in the description. I feel like I'm being profiled. What's going on

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

neutered instance?

Neutral? Not sure there is. Maybe ask in one of the ask Lemmy communities. Tho generally Lemmy is left leaning as a whole.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Alright. Well everyone is entitled to their opinions. If we need to bring classism even into a federated environment, I guess it's all in human nature.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Idk if I'd say its that. Some instances cater to techies, others to lgbt, and others to anarchy. Yours just happens to be Marxist. It also happens that many critiques around the .ml servers are that they don't care about practical results (often arguing against things that might give some relief). Your initial comment here is cutting against the grain of what that community typically advocate for.

[-] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How do ".ml" communuties typically attract people from the same cut of cloth? It's not like such leanings are written somewhere?

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Either your in on how .ml is used in that context or promoted in other circles with those leanings. Tho I don't really know. Its also the instance that the main Lemmy dev manages.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
614 points (100.0% liked)

World News

49656 readers
2135 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS