90
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.


The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] karn@anarchist.nexus 36 points 1 week ago

Seeing how Goat tried to ping db0 because they voted in the thread to drag them into debate, I'm gonna go with PTB on this one.

If they wanted to prove their point, they should have given links that proved their point.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 week ago

Never mind that anarchists are explicitly anti-authoritarian, apparently db0 is a tankie now? Lol, yep checks out. Those twatwaffles think a "tankie" is anyone who is critical of the Dems, or of US foreign policy. OPs comments were also accurate imo regarding China's influence in Myanmar being a much stronger example of Chinese imperialism.

The libs have got some nerve getting hysterical about the Uyghurs when they obviously couldn't give two shits about their own government (and their own party) continually voting to keep supplying weapons to Israel in order to continue its genocide in Gaza. Has China been shitty and authoritarian towards the Uyghurs? Yes, no doubt. Is it a genocide of the type and scale that Israel is currently waging? Absolutely not.

PTB

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I always said it was only a matter of time before the social fascists that call MWoG their home would turn on even dbzer0. It's the classic Nazi bar, they outright fabricate info, erase context, welcome Zionists and other fascists, it was only a matter of time before they got even greedier and started attacking anarchists for being "tankies."

It's not a coincidence that they call us "roaches" or "degenerates," it's because it's a cryptofash meeting spot.

Edit: lmao, seems I pissed off the social fascist. I couldn't even engage if I wanted to interact with your Nazi bar, because PJ bans me from every comm they mod because they lost an argument in a comm they don't mod. Go fuck yourself, fascist. Keep spreading hasbara, keep tending your garden of Zionists. Palestine will be free, and there's nothing you can do to stop that.

[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

didnt u ban me from a community for no reason

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

For "violating the disengage rule" so no, not for "no reason".

[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Rule is kinda hard to find. The link to the anarchist code of conduct appears to be broken. I checked the rules before but missed the code of conduct for the instance.

Fair enough. Lmao.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

On top of everything else, using mod/admin privileges to reveal users’ votes is just bad form.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

The main reason reddit is shit is because it's so easy to manipulate votes. I'm happy most lemmy instances have public voting.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

Reddit is easy to sockpuppet because it’s a corporation with one primary goal: MUA go up. Ad sales and user data sales. If the vote manipulation and shill posts/comments don’t hurt user engagement metrics then they don’t care.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago

User votes are public on Lemmy. One should be held accountable for their votes

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

User votes are public on Lemmy.

The only reason they’re “public” is an artifact of ActivityPub’s architecture that can’t be designed around, because if it could be, it would be. Users who continue to expose votes after being warned may get banned (which thankfully is extremely rare so far). Instances like lemvotes.org get defederated.

One should be held accountable for their votes

They are held accountable, by the mods & admins. Vote spam/manipulation accounts get banned.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Users who continue to expose votes after being warned may get banned

Depends on the instance I think.

They are held accountable, by the mods & admins.

So correct me if I'm wrong but regular mods can't see it and only admins.

So this is just an anecdotal impression but when lemvotes came online, a few mods and users got called out for their zionist voting. After that, the amount of pro Israel propaganda being upvoted, posted and commented went down by quite a bit.

It's too much to ask of admins imo, going through downvotes. More importantly, I'd rather the bad actors have potentially any one of us to fear instead of a just a handful of already too busy admins.

[-] Blaze@lazysoci.al 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

regular mods can’t see it and only admins.

Regular mods can see since a few months now. I didn't use to be the case.

[-] princessnorah 1 points 5 days ago

God that seems like a bad idea.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depends on the instance I think.

Of course. I can only speak to lemmy.ml. Other instance admins are welcome to add their 2¢.

So correct me if I’m wrong but regular mods can’t see it and only admins.

Until recently that was true, but I think mods can now see the votes in their communities.

It’s too much to ask of admins imo, going through downvotes.

Could be. I think at least one instance has built tooling/automation around it. The thing is, dealing with users getting into arguments/fights/vendettas over votes may also be a lot to ask of admins.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1454 readers
190 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS