I'm a bit hesitant to post this, but it comes from a place of genuine curiosity and of wanting a clearer understanding of the situation. Because trying to make sense of things through online resources feels like a minefield. My gut tells me that migration is a good thing, but I want some solid ammunition for when far-right idiots try to argue.
Firstly it seems like there is a large amount of conflation between 'immigration', 'illegal immigration' and 'asylum seekers'. As far as I understand it, asylum seekers are coming into this country legally in order to apply for asylum. However, a lot come in via small boats which is an illegal method of entry. It seems that there are very few legal ways to enter if you're an asylum seeker. Once you're here though, I think it's legal once you're going through the asylum process? Either way as far as I can tell, asylum seekers make for a small portion of the overall number of immigrants. But when you see people protesting, they mainly seem to be concerned by people coming in via boats. Surely it's fair greater number of legal migrants that are the ones more likely to put a strain on infrastructure?
And yes there definitely are strains on the NHS and other public services. The population is growing, and these services need to grow alongside that. But isn't it more sensible to say that the fault lies not with migrants, but the fact that these services are being mismanaged and underfunded?
I've also heard that the UK has an ageing population. Without immigration we soon won't have the workforce necessary to support the non-working portion of the population.
So is there actually an issue with immigration, or do the people that argue that case actually have it backwards? Is the problem actually our underfunded services, and the whole immigration rhetoric purely populist nonsense to get the far-right in power (who in turn, aim to give tax breaks to the rich and exacerbate the issue even further)?
And where exactly can I go to get factual information about this sort of thing?
The problem is that this is a poisoned dogwhistle topic. In general, immigration on average has a positive effect on the economies the people are migrating to; however, the people who want to create in group/out group dynamics are keen to use immigrants as a scapegoat to blame for the failings of a country.
For every grooming gang or place of congragation of immigrants unwilling to assimilate, there are many more people just integrating, getting jobs and contributing to the economy with their skills. However, due to news being sensationalised, only the bad apples get the spotlight, people who are looking for an easy solution are shown the bad apples, etc etc.
For a similar topic of study that is less charged, look up statistics on how long people are on benefits for. Are there many scroungers, or do people get jobseeker's allowance through a tough period, find work, and get off benefits? Also bear in mind that whenever you have any kind of system, there will be people looking to abuse it and succeed.
Thanks for this, that agrees with my general feelings on the case. Like you say, it's sensationalist media highlighting the few outliers and ignoring the beneficial majority.
In other words, the scapegoating is just another propaganda technique to help fascists seize power.