It doesn’t really make sense to compare a world war (initiated by Germany) with a terrorist attack (shaped by a long history of people being instrumentalized in a Cold War context) - unless you’re trying to imply something specific. What exactly?
Also, I was born in Dresden - I know firsthand what it looks like to play the victim while ignoring the bigger picture.
it was a straight Soviet invasion, so basically a full role reversal.
while writing, i was confused about this. was it a russian puppet state that was established, or like directly reporting to moscow. so i thought russia influenced was a safer bet.
Would 9/11 also qualify for saying FAFO, seeing that the person supposedly organising it was an ex-CIA asset?
It doesn’t really make sense to compare a world war (initiated by Germany) with a terrorist attack (shaped by a long history of people being instrumentalized in a Cold War context) - unless you’re trying to imply something specific. What exactly?
Also, I was born in Dresden - I know firsthand what it looks like to play the victim while ignoring the bigger picture.
Yes
if i have my facts correctly, taliban as a whole was funded by us to overpower the then russian influenced govt.
And ironically one of the more potent weapons the Taliban had against the US was US Stinger surface-to-air missiles.
But it was not just a Russian influenced govt, it was a straight Soviet invasion, so basically a full role reversal.
while writing, i was confused about this. was it a russian puppet state that was established, or like directly reporting to moscow. so i thought russia influenced was a safer bet.