297
Incels, listen up
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
297 points (100.0% liked)
tumblr
5060 readers
1247 users here now
Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
-
No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.
Sister Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I guess? My explanation fits that maxim about as well as yours, so it doesn't really resolve anything.
Mine has one step. Yours has two: subterfuge and then we have to accept someone honestly evaluates the sexual viability of a mathematical theorem
Yours is two steps: think of something unexpected to have sex with, make a compelling argument for laughs.
Mine is one step : write up your secret sexual fantasy, the wilder the better. The "wildness" inherently provides subterfuge, because it makes people incredulous.
What you attributed to me was the task presented to both genders, not the explanation I gave. They were still supposed to come up with an explanation so I don't know why you left that out in the latter
But you think the examples given were honest—Non-corporeal concepts?
This is the most autistic argument I’ve ever read on the internet, and my first browser was Lynx.
Whatup to all my altavista homies.
Bet you had a copy of this fucker too:
HotBot for life