851
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 75 points 13 hours ago

Google says it's no different than checking IDs at the airport.

Fucker, if I own the airport, own the planes in the airport, am the only person using my own planes in my own airport, then nobody is asking for my ID.

Our phone, our software choice.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Read the contracts you sign when you buy your phone and you'll understand how wrong you are. The problem here is we have very little choices. Monopolies kill consumer choice.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

99% of those contracts are not enforceable. And I bought my phone used. No paper, no contract.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Read the contracts you sign when you buy your phone

Contracts? Unless I'm buying a subsidized phone where a mobile phone plan is required, I'm not sure what other contract I'd be signing. I never got one from Samsung, OnePlus, Google, any used marketplace, or Amazon.

They get paid, and I get hardware to do what I like with it. If I can't do what I want with it, then I'm renting, and I should be paying a rental fee, not a "full price".

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Fucker, if I own the airport, own the planes in the airport, am the only person using my own planes in my own airport, then nobody is asking for my ID.

Okay, but what if Google owns the airport, the planes, and thinks it's entitled to own the people flying on them, to boot?

Our phone, our software choice.

You'll Own Nothing And Be Happy

[-] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

There it is, haha.

Gave me a good chuckle as i'm with you here.

I have a similar sentiment when it comes to ads, my device, i pay for the internet and the device is inside my home. I'll decide if you get to show me ads.

[-] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

For ads at least the argument can be made that the content you consume is not yours and as such you should not be allowed to choose how it is monetized.

Google unilaterally deciding this is like Firefox or chrome adding ads to websites. Which is like no... They're the medium through which content is consumed.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 12 points 11 hours ago

But what if you owned nothing and were happy about it?

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

The minimalist in me would love that. But while I am paying for this shit, it's mine to do what the hell I damn well please with it!

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
851 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74519 readers
3382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS