399

Pentagon official confirms plan as House minority leader Jeffries says president is ‘playing’ with Americans’ lives

Planning is underway to send national guard troops to Chicago, an official at the Pentagon confirmed to ABC News on Sunday.

“We won’t speculate on further operations. The Department is a planning organization and is continuously working with other agency partners on plans to protect federal assets and personnel,” a Department of Defense official said, according to ABC.

Earlier on Sunday, Hakeem Jeffries, House minority leader and New York Democratic congressman, said Donald Trump has “manufactured a crisis” to justify sending federalized national guard troops into Chicago next, over the heads of local leaders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago

Why aren't all blue controlled states viewing this as an act of war? The federal government is literally invading states against the states' will. First LA, then DC, now Chicago? Where the fuck is the line drawn?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

Everybody has their own red line. I have two.

The first is a person very close to me, who is a member of multiple vulnerable demographics. If anything happens to them, it's on. I'd become a very dangerous person.

The second is elections. We have NEVER suspended elections in America, not even during the Civil War. If elections are suspended, America ceases to exist, and if that happens, then I have no obligation to pay taxes or follow ANY laws. It's Robin Hood Economics, and I'm heading for the nice neighborhood.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

What are the national guard going to do? What do you think they're going to do? They're there to provoke and instigate, they'll lay around in public buildings and twiddle their thumbs and life will go on as normal.

It's questionably an invasion, but they aren't going to actually do anything because that would require someone to give the orders to do something, and the GOP is spineless as shit when it comes to putting their names on things.

They want to illicit a response, let them waste their time.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Ummm, how about it's setting a super fucked up precedent? Even if they don't do anything, it should absolutely not be something that's tolerated and normalized to have armed military roaming our streets.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago

Politicians waiting for the public to get riled up. Public waiting for the politicians to start something. Classic bystander effect at work.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago

Remember the Ok Corral scene in Tombstone, where they all freeze with their guns out, and wait for the other guys to make the first move?

That's where we are right now.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

I notice a lot of people on lemmy shaming others for not doing anything while they themselves clearly aren't doing anything either

[-] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

while they themselves clearly aren't doing anything either

We're doing something. We're pooping!

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 14 hours ago

I don't control local police forces or national guards or even any militia groups. The best i can do it stockpile liquor bottles and Styrofoam

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I assume the majority aren't Americans.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

But they tend to assume whoever they're talking to is American

[-] Embargo@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago

Classic bystander effect at work.

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 1 day ago

I don't think it's that, but more that nobody wants to be the first. It's going to be a hell of an entry in the history books, and once someone breaks the seal then a lot of activities across the US are going to start being a hell of a lot more lethal.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago

It's basically a high tension Gordion knot where whoever cuts it gets turned into physics when all the energy gets released from it. Wherever first revolts is probably gonna get ass blasted until things can be organized or until chaos spreads enough that effective assault is made impossible.

[-] ToaLanjiao@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends. Are they American to begin with? If not, the rest of us are just watching this particular shitstorm, if you don't mind.

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, as a non-American, having lived with being exposed all my life to the American propagated myth about Americans being the most freedom loving and individualistic people on Earth, it is a bit curious to see how quick and unopposed the implementation of dictatorship in the US is.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

The average person has not been personally impacted enough to do anything about it. Until they are, and a large enough number of people feel they're on a path to losing everything, will they do something about it.

You can't get more selfishly individualistic than the current American response to fascism, but this is nothing new. They couldn't even agree that everyone deserves healthcare.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

The weird thing is, is that the people criticizing the people who criticize those not doing anything are themselves not doing anything either. Not an American btw. It's bystanders all the way down!

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago

I can't wait for them to try it in NYC.

[-] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

If I learned anything in my life so far, it's that no one ever comes to help.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

They'll draw the line when it's too late to stop it

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
399 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25385 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS