1201
submitted 2 years ago by gsa32@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bogdart@lemmy.world 238 points 2 years ago

I wish they release a tool for their system to work properly. Like connecting to Bluetooth headphones or no full cpu load out of nowhere.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 118 points 2 years ago

Those are premium windows 14 features.

[-] FluffyToaster621@lemm.ee 29 points 2 years ago

Imagine they skip 12 and call it 13 like they did with W10

[-] WhiteRaven22@midwest.social 19 points 2 years ago

Microsoft always has such a weird relationship with naming conventions... just look at Xbox and all of its descendants.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 14 points 2 years ago

Can't wait for Windows 720 X Series XS.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago
[-] spearz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

One can't wait for Windows 720 X Series XS.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

You. I like you.

[-] KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

pwilrgc_Win* wPtr = CONSTANT_MACRO_MAP.GetHandle();

[-] tool@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Imagine they skip 12 and call it 13 like they did with W10

With as little sense as Microsoft makes most of the time, that decision actually does make sense. A lot of programs and scripts were lazy about checking the Windows version and just checked for the presence of a '9' in the version string to determine if they were running on Windows 95/98.

A bunch of shit would have broken if they had released Windows 10 as Windows 9, which is what it should have been semantically.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Never knew that, and it makes total sense.

[-] Hexagon@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago

That's not how it works. It started as a joke, until someone took it at face value and started spreading it as a fact. Like the flat earth

[-] tool@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

A Microsoft dev literally gave that as the reason, my man.

[-] Hexagon@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago

Can I ask you for a source then? If it's true I'll re-evaluate my life choices

[-] tool@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Dude deleted his account, but the original comment is here.

[-] Hexagon@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago

Well TIL. I thought nobody in their sane mind would actually check the OS version like that, but reality proved me wrong

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They are more likely to skip Windows 13 due to "triskaidekaphobia" (fear of the number 13) though, like they did with internal versions for Office:

  • Office 2003 (11.0)
  • Office 2007 (12.0)
  • Office 2010 (14.0)
  • Office 2013 (15.0)

But I imagine it will be something more stupid like Windows L or Windows One.

[-] whosdadog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

The next version will clearly be Windows 11 Series W.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

For some reason Windows L sounds like the worst possible name for a Windows version.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Hey that's why I wrote 14. Because I think they will

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Windows 9 was a real thing.

[-] thal3s@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 years ago

Instructions unclear, advertisements added to start menu 

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

That "system interrupts" is extremely important.

[-] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

Whole thing has to get thrown out and rebuilt, its an ancient bloated mess underneath, but they waited too long and now the entire world relies on it.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Am I crazy or are they just reskinning old windows? Go deep enough and old windows things pop up in a disjarring manner.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

That's by design. One of windows core features is it's backwards compatibility.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

I'm not talking that old programs can be run. I'm talking if you dig into the settings deep enough, a Windows 2000 looking screen will pop up out of nowhere.

[-] klyde@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

It's the same thing. Stuff relies on it. And some stuff is just there from laziness. The only Windows being reskinned is 10. That's what 11 is underneath.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's probably because of compatibility. Who knows, maybe that's the loadbareing UI. It all falls apart if they change it.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I mean control panel still is usable on windows 11. Control Panel has been there since 1985. The UI control panel uses now hasn't really been changed since Windows 95. There are plenty of other screens like that too, like the hardware properties menus and stuff.

[-] Skies5394@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

It blows my mind that system file checker isn’t just a scheduled task that works during idle time. Same with DISM.

[-] gerdesj@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

You can easily schedule it yourself but I wouldn't. I have used sfc /scannow about 10 times. It did fix an issue once - a VM repeatedly locking up doing Windows updates.

[-] catshit_dogfart@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah even as a technician that's one I run on the off chance that it actually does something.

Which, sometimes it does, just often enough that I wouldn't call it useless.

[-] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago

I wish they would make their configuration better. At this point even MacOS easier in that regard. And that is saying something. I constantly find myself googling how to open the old configuration pages because it’s either impossible to find where some of the configuration options went or they don’t exist on the new UIs in the first place. It’s a real down grade. They are trying to go the MacOS route but stopped half way through. Windows 11 feels like a real downgrade compared to Windows 10.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They’ve been trying to kill Control Panel since 2012 bahahahaha

[-] hactar42@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

My Bluetooth headphones work just fine. Except every time the connect the automatically set the volume to 100%.

[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

no full cpu load out of nowhere.

Ah sudden background updates, how I hate them.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
1201 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61850 readers
2706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS