834
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

yeah. still not worth dealing with fucking cloudflare. fuck cloudflare.

[-] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago
[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That would be terrible for a lot of people as they are the only company providing such services that doesn't charge for traffic.

[-] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They can use web.archive.org as a cdn(I do that to cloudflare websites). But honestly, cloudflare or not, the internet is broken.

[-] turmoil@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Using archive.org as a CDN at the scale of Cloudflare would be an immediate death sentence for archive.org.

[-] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

well I'm doing my part: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bcma/ sorry archive.org, I promise I'll donate ❤️

[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Can you explain please? How can I use archive.org as a cdn for my website?

[-] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

just take a snapshot of your website... then make all links to your website link to that snapshot, and turn your server off.

[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, well, it's okay if it suits for you. Just not at all an alternative to cloudflare.

[-] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

I have an alternative to cloudflare, it's sitting in my living room and it's called a raspberry pi.

[-] oppy1984@lemdro.id 1 points 1 day ago

I'm out of the loop, what's wrong with cloud flare?

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Centralization, mostly, but also their hands-off approach to most fascist content.

[-] oppy1984@lemdro.id 2 points 22 hours ago

I get the centralization concerns, but I would think that's on the consumer since there are other options. As for the fascist content, as another commenter said, they could risk their safe harbor if they started stated regulating content that they weren't legally required to regulate.

Just my thoughts.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They kind of have to be hands off or risk losing safe harbor protections.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
834 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74289 readers
4316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS