104
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I wonder what the end game is for extreme gerrymandering. If every state with a legislative trifecta (and a court who wouldn't overturn it) suddenly did a partisan redistricting all at once , who would come out ahead?

We are already at the point where most districts are firmly held on one side or another, and control of Congress rests on a tiny handful of competitive districts, maybe 20 out of 435. What happens when that decreases to 5 or 10?

[-] relativestranger@feddit.nl 17 points 3 days ago

If every state with a legislative trifecta (and a court who wouldn't overturn it) suddenly did a partisan redistricting all at once , who would come out ahead?

it ain't gonna be 'the people', that's for sure.

--from ballotpedia

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

Saw someone do a rough estimate mapped out all states with current trifectas and found that neither side could lock in a majority if that went to the max and could make maps that went 100% one side or another. Republicans in that scenario have a slight edge, but still 84 seats that wouldn't be decided by gerrymandering alone (how much of a swing district it actually is may vary). It was a rough estimate so take it with a grain of salt. That also assumed that the states with independent legislative committees all remove said committees and that the Voting Rights Act becomes 100% gutted

State and local elections are going to matter a lot even if it doesn't go to that extreme scenario. Make sure to always vote in them. Virginia and New Jersey have important statewide elections coming up this off-year in November

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It's also important to note that at the edges of gerrymandering you trade certainty in any district for number of legislators. You can play it well to guarantee a victory under normal circumstances, but if you've gerrymandered heavily you better hope your base doesn't crack.

Purely hypothetically, you'd likely get the same kind of split and games that were pulled in the leadup to the Civil War with the whole Mason-Dixie line thing. With likely the same resulting consequences.

Just now nuclear and biological and chemical weapons exist and weapons are incomparably more dangerous

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
104 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25119 readers
1967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS