15

Asking as it seems that CSL1 still holds up very well today, and CSL2 is still buggy for traffic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] megopie 5 points 3 days ago

CSL2 still has some serious performance issues, like it’s better than it was, but at high pops it really start to chug, and a lot of weird behaviors start to occur in parts of the simulation. Which really makes it hard to build out complex multi modal transit networks which kind of require a large pop to make work.

It does some things better than CSL1, namely around allowing a city to operate without cars, and supporting mixed use buildings. Although it has 0 support for bikes. Like bikes just don’t exist.

I jump between both depending on what I want to do. If I want to build a compact city with nearly no cars, I got to CSL2. For large cities with complex transit networks I go for CSL1.

[-] Blaze@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Citybuilders

393 readers
12 users here now

Welcome, mayor!

Welcome to City Hall, here you will find out what's happening amongst various city builder titles, both new and old. Feel free to discuss with your fellow advisors and mayors, and share your successful and less-than-successful cities alike.

Regional Connections:
Rules:
  1. Memes welcome but keep it within reason.
  2. Keep this SFW.
  3. Respect others.
  4. Be kind always.

Remember, you're a representative of your city so be on your best behaviour.

~Subreddit~ ~icon~ ~created~ ~by~ ~Eucalyp~ ~-~ ~Flaticon~

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS