Considering the odd strawman comparison to nuclear power plants you started your argument with, I suspect the level of understanding of Hegelian dialectical materialism you have learnt from the AI, is probably not as advanced as you seem to think it is.

Also every single one of your examples describe situations which could have been solved by other means (and it would even require you to exercise that brain of yours a bit as well, an added bonus no doubt).

What does your precious AI say to the fact that people are being forced to save water so a corporation can mindlessly waste it on their profits instead? That seems to me to be the core of this subject, something you not only breezed lightly over but in fact completely ignored in favour of your personal anecdotes.

You could have already done all of this with the internet itself...I dont understand why people think they need llms. Hell, you could have done all of that just from books, no internet needed. I feel like people are as lazy as they've ever been.

Also, you totally trust everything you learned. Thats not smart, being that its literally a corporate owned propaganda machine thats purpose is only to sell you ads to make the rich richer. Why do you think they are putting billions into it? Its sure as FUCK not for betterment of humanity.

Something tells me all of the stuff you're creating with the assistance of AI is garbage.

Not even because you're using AI to do it, but because what most people create isn't impressive and I doubt your skilled enough to be an exception.

You might think AI is helping you and making you better, but that's probably because you're not put in actual positions where your performance is measured and matters.

For me, AI is only useful for consolidating search results into a response. It's wrong more often than its not, and to make use of what it says in any meaningful capacity requires knowledge that AI can't give you.