191
submitted 2 days ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/world@lemmy.world

An interim update from the EHRC, published in May, said that “trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use the men’s facilities, as this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities”.

However, a response from Museums Galleries Scotland (MGS), which supports around 455 non-national museums and is funded by the Scottish Government, said EHRC’s proposals may “force some museums to close”, or “risk leaving trans people with no facilities at all” if changes could not be made.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 105 points 2 days ago

Gendered bathrooms have always been stupid. Everybody poops, everybody pees, it's good enough to just have a room where everyone can do that.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 26 points 2 days ago

Bathroom stalls are nasty. Just have poop rooms with good ventilation and a community sink.

[-] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago

Oh fuck that. No way I want to line up behind 20 women when I need to drop a deuce

[-] possumparty 14 points 1 day ago

yeah this isn't really an issue in Denmark where gender neutral toilets are fairly regular.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 38 points 2 days ago

The fun thing is tha t by combining them you reduce the waiting tolime overall for everyone together, while making it a bit longer for the now privileged.

[-] illi@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

This. Most of the time women have to wait in long lines while men's room is empty. There were times women would loose patience and just went to man's room because why not.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Most women will not be using the urinal, though, which is why men's bathrooms are often much quicker to get through.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

This is why it's now becoming standard design practice in the design of restrooms for large public buildings to simply build the women's restroom larger than the men's. This is really the classic "equality vs. equity." Equality means building both restrooms the same size. Equity means realizing that to deliver the same level of service - the same average wait time, the women's restrooms probably should just be built larger and with more total stalls. So you build out your restrooms with the number of stalls in the women's room being about 40% or so greater than the total number of stalls and urinals in the men's.

[-] illi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

That too. But especially with smaller bathrooms you have situations with lines to women's while men's being just empty

[-] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 16 points 2 days ago

I mean you could do separate lines or something for that— but at the same time maybe that just means you need more bathrooms if there is a significant line. Also maybe making a separate powder room would reduce the lines by directing those who want to do make up or something to a different place.

[-] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

It's not make up that causes long lines. Please tell me you're being sarcastic and I've missed it.

I think their idea is a good idea for freeing up sink space, but as far as decreasing the line? That's not gonna happen.

For those unaware - those long lines you see outside the door? They extend into the bathroom. As soon as a stall opens up, the next person goes in. We're not waiting for sinks or mirrors.

[-] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 9 points 2 days ago

This is the way. The shitter and the talking-shit areas should be separate.

[-] Simplicity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Missed opportunity for taking shit and talking shit.

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Wait are you saying they´re taking up bathroom stalls to do their makeup??

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

No. This thread is just full of guys who don't understand how female anatomy works.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Word of caution. Many politicians are into that.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48758 readers
1990 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS