117
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
49769 readers
390 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
When you say "people" you're really talking about the stores, right? The stores just put the price they charge, not the taxes which they don't get. Yes, taxes vary from state to state, but it's not like we're all going to different states every day. I know what the tax rate is in my area, and so I know to add that when I see a price in a store.
If you really mean "people" as in customers, it depends. If I'm telling someone that a store has a good price, I'll just quote the store's price. But sometimes when I'm talking about what I paid, I'll include everything "Wow, I can't believe this cart of groceries was $150..."
It would require zero effort for the stores to post the actual prices. This is just another example of Capitalism Stockholm Syndrome that's displayed by so many Americans. This practice is dishonest and serves no other purpose but to deceive the consumer.
It's certainly for the store's benefit, not the consumer's, but you're over stating things. Sure, there's no incentive for the store too post anything other than the price they charge, and not the state and federal charges the government layers on top of that. There's no law requiring them to do so, and obviously they'd rather post the smaller price. We could change that by making it a law, but no one really seems to care that much - just doesn't seem like that big of a deal.
Counterpoint to this is gas stations and the fact that they include taxes in the price on the giant sign by the road. Why should retail be any different?
I think that's because the stations already pay the tax when they buy from suppliers, but wholesalers don't do this. I could be wrong.
No one is deceived. We all know there are taxes.
Why do consumers accept a system like this? Wouldn’t it be just better for consumers if the shop pricetag represented the exact amount you have to pay at the counter?
Sure, sounds nice. But is it bad enough that people feel compelled to create a ballot measure and get it changed? Apparently not.
Yeah apparently so. I guess it’s not the top of mind problem Americans have right now.
Over here various pro-consumer watchdog organisations would protest wildly and the merchant would most likely get fined for false advertising. So the whole thing feels a bit alien to me.
You've got that right!
Sure if we started the whole tax thing today we may do it different. But it’s culture created over time. Our sales taxes all started during and shortly after the Great Depression in the 1920s. I’m sure store owners likely preferred people realize what they were charging vs the govts take. This is why I like it now. It’s very clear what the govt is taking and what the store is charging. It doesn’t bug me at all to have it added on at the register. It’s all I’ve known for 40 years. Currently I even live in a state with no sales tax (recently moved here), but I’m in a small tourist town that implemented a “resort sales tax” of 1% to help pay for city services related to tourism.
I think there's also a fundamental cultural difference in that "govts take". We don't normally see taxes as "taking" in that sense, but I fully understand where you're coming from - it makes sense and seems to work for you guys.
Only an American would assume that when someone says people they mean companies instead of, you know, people. 🤦♂️
I assumed that because of his wording. People I know don't really "name prices," businesses do. My guess was that it was the businesses that he meant, and since it was responses about businesses that he replied to, I think I was right. But, in case, I answered for regular people, too. Don't know why you have to be shitty about it.