68
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Charger8232@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I am looking for recommendations for an open source self-hosted ~~version control system~~ source code hosting service. I found a few, but I can't decide on which one to pick:

If there's a better one than the ones I've listed here, I'd love to hear about it!

I care primarily about privacy and security, if that makes any difference.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

IMO, the Gogs dev was correct. If you look at that community input and what Gitea became, I was glad to use the version that rejected it.

But I don't know how it compares with Forgejo.

[-] _cryptagion@quokk.au 8 points 1 year ago

It’s Gitea with some security fixes and community input, as open source software should be.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

what's the problem with gitea? I never used gogs so I can't compare it

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The added features made it harder to deploy, came with some bugs, and overall traded a simple design for community-oriented features that IMO were a negative value overall.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

made it harder to deploy? Isn't it still just a single binary, a config file and a directory for data?

bugs are inevitable for evolving software.

which community oriented features do you mean? are they in the way, or is it just that you don't need them?

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60934 readers
845 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS