274
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Imagine being ticketed for walking the wrong way down a sidewalk or crossing the street. At intersections pedestrians generally have the right of way unless it's signalized (or a car is already inside the intersection).

Cyclist are pedestrians.

These kind of stories almost read as "car is king" and all other modes of travel (walking, running, cycling) are required to conform around the car. Next thing you know grandma will get a ticket for riding her mobility scooter the wrong way down a sidewalk.

The main issue is improper Infrastructure. Streets are destinations and Roads are throughways. Street are multi-use and should be designed as such.

This is a street. It's a destination where local pedestrians have the right of way.

1000029691

This is a "strode" its a neither a street or a road. Car rule and use these as throughways.

1000029690

This is a road. It's a proper throughway with no street parking or driveways. Reduced conflict zones such as no intersections or left turn.

1000029692

Also obligatory:

Emotos, ie. "Self powered" high speed electric motorcycles should be treated similar to regular motorcycles or cars.

Ebikes ie. "Pedal assist" or "human-powered" bicycles are low speed and similar in nature to regular bicycles or in some cases "mobility devices" like grandmas mobility scooter.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Cyclist are pedestrians.

Unless you mean this in some very unconventional way — absolutely not. Bicycles are vehicles.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I would agree any item that is used to transport goods or people in any way is considered a vehicle, but i would add the term "vehicle" is somewhat loose in meaning or interpretation.

There are two distinct classes of vehicles though. Self-powered and Human-powered.

Self-powered vehicles. Example, an aircraft, car, tank, truck, motorcycle, scooter.

Human-powered vehicles. Example, a bicycle, unicycle, balance bicycles, scooter, dandy horse, handcar, draisine, shoping cart, and maybe even shoes?

Now the reason I believe classifying cyclists as pedestrians, is because it would require a "shift" in how infrastructure is designed within our towns and cities.

The city "strode" is a unsafe place for a pedestrian or people in general to be (as it's currently designed). Classifying a cyclist as a pedestrian would highlight the need that the equivalent of "sidewalk infrastructure" is required for the well-being of people on a bicycle.

Now imagine yourself walking (in your shoes) on a city "strode" in the middle of a lane, it feels "wrong". So why do we force all ages of people on a bicycle to do this?

[-] LilB0kChoy@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I saw this same story from another source in a different post (https://archive.is/sZYDO).

There’s one specific paragraph in that article that is not covered in this one:

New York City has begun a crackdown on e-bikes and scooters riders. It follows actions by city officials from Paris to Honolulu to Hoboken, N.J., who are responding to residents angry about zippy vehicles with silent electric motors zooming down sidewalks and streets, often startling people, and occasionally hitting pedestrians.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Now the reason I believe classifying cyclists as pedestrians, is because it would require a "shift" in how infrastructure is designed within our towns and cities.

Nah, classifying bicycles as pedestrians would be the worst of all worlds and result in the elimination of all considerations for bicycles just like we’ve been working on for pedestrians over the past hundred years.

[-] ksigley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When was the last time you road a bicycle on a busy roadway ? Bikes are not vehicles.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Uh… yesterday?

Bikes absolutely are vehicles.

Cars are dangerous weapons

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think the question has become, are bikes cars?

From the definition of a vehicle it's something that is used to transport people or goods, and a vehicle can be "self power" or "human powered".

By definition rollerblades are vehicles.

Now I think the question becomes (for people that see bikes as cars)

Are people on bikes allowed to use the full lane of a roadway, just as any vehicle that is classified as a car would?

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Are people on bikes allowed to use the full lane of a roadway, just as any vehicle that is classified as a car would?

Basically every place in the US, the answer is emphatically “yes”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycles_May_Use_Full_Lane

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

not even close, people are pedestrians, ive encountered more often than not that bicycles ignore pedestratians when they are crossing the streets, or if they are behind a person, sorry but they act like they are in cars themselves.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What about a person on rollerblades?

By definition they are a vehicle, but are they a car?

[-] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Down voted for this:

Cyclist are pedestrians.

But want to say thanks for the explanations. Regardless of whether I agree with your opinions.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
274 points (100.0% liked)

News

31384 readers
2414 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS