187
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by MonsterBug@sh.itjust.works to c/fediverselore@lemmy.ca

Its a shame because they're prominent voice on lemmy. Good on the admins for not tolerating this. I don't understand the point of targeting a person you don't like on the internet just because they said something that upset you and spamming their post with downvotes. If you don't like someone block their ass and be done with it. I agree with the perspective that its harassment (and an incredibly petty ineffective form of it at that)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Oh, I don't like engaging with him or any of his posts because he tends to be a loudmouth radlib but he is a power user and his posts on other communities are just fine.

It'd be nice if I could, like, put a comment on one of his political posts, though, without it turning into a gigantic, massive thread arguing about the specifics of electoralism and lesser evil and all of that nonsense.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago

he tends to be a loudmouth radlib

Okay, so now we've got "loser," "twat," "loudmouth," has a psychological disorder, "zio," mental issues, the whole nine yards.

And, somehow, that's not abusive. PJ giving downvotes and arguing about politics, though, is.

Good to know.

[-] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

He's a genocide-supporting Zionist radlib who thinks it's fun to spend his day insulting people who bring in Marxist/anarchist theory.

By the way, radlib is not an insult. It describes his political position ๐Ÿ™„

Finally, he even admitted that he is a loudmouth (tangentially), so I don't know what you're going on about here. Someone who will argue with you for 100 plus comments I would consider to be a "loudmouth".

And, somehow, that's not abusive. PJ giving downvotes and arguing about politics, though, is.

It would be insulting to describe what he does as debating or arguing. He spends most of the time using falicious techniques in order to try and point score the best he can, so that he doesn't actually have to engage with anything you say, and then when you bring up something specific, he'll just ignore the point.

It's also entirely inappropriate to follow a user around to small communities that you're not a part of to downvote when the voting system is supposed to be whether or not a post matches the tone of the community.

It's unfortunate you're unable to view nuance.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago

It's unfortunate you're unable to view nuance.

Lol

Okey dokey

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
187 points (100.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

3153 readers
1 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS