36
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
321 readers
250 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No videos.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera.
- NBC.
- CNBC.
- Substack.
- Tom's Hardware.
- ZDNet.
- TechSpot.
- Ars Technica.
- Vox Media outlets, with exception for Axios(Due to being ad free.)
- Engadget.
- TechCrunch.
- Gizmodo.
- Futurism.
- PCWorld.
- ComputerWorld.
- Mashable.
- Hackaday.
- WCCFTECH.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
I don't think Discord is great. But it's better than dealing with "Unable to decrypt message" on every message I get. It's better than being unable to properly search a channel, or server. It's better than the slow mess that Element (and other matrix clients as well!) are.
This explains so much. Why in the world is matrix not built on OTP??? Discord got this correct, right at the start. They went all in on Elixir and Rust and ho-boy, you can tell.
I honestly do not understand the draw... at all.
The enshittification reaper is coming for Discord; the writing is on the wall, they are planning an IPO this year. The draw is that it isn't Discord and that you can own and control the data produced by your organization (or peer group), and have reasonable control over how the platform is changed. Now if none of that appeals to you then you probably aren't the target audience.
I never understood the draw of matrix.org as a service, the ideas originally driving matrix's development back in 2017 or so was to be to Discord/Slack/Teams what Lemmy is to Reddit.
That stuff does appeal to me, but Zulip has done it better for a very long time now. Matrix, while decentralized, really provides nothing else besides pain. Organizations don’t usually care about federation. They want a single chat app that they control and they’re ok if it’s FOSS.
Like, if I’m an organization I’m choosing Slack or Zulip 100% of the time. If I’m playing games with my friends I’m choosing Discord. There really aren’t good alternatives. Everything else sucks incredibly badly.
Erlang maybe a better tech choice, but it's still a pretty bad take. Tons of much larger scale applications built on either njs or python. I certainly don't think that tech choice is what's killing Matrix. Maybe one could argue general incompetence or lack of experience on the developers though
I don’t really think there’s any massively large scale messaging apps built on node or python that function well. Node has a decent connection limit, but there have been thousands of articles written on all the difficulties you will have with that and getting it to actually perform at that level. Yes it will run, but not well. Python just isn’t even close to node, so I’m not gonna bother with that. OTP was built for this. The matrix org might have been able to get it to work with Python or node eventually but when you’re building an application that needs to be easily maintained by the open source community with as few architectural decisions as possible, it’s just not gonna work out unless you’ve chosen the right tool for the job to start with.
Edit: Zulip (the best oss chat app I’ve used) is written in Python and typescript but it’s not built for anything other than single org use. For single org use you’re not going to have tens of millions of messages a day.