899

I would still download a car if I could. 🚗 (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Gork@sopuli.xyz to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

208 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] SnotFlickerman 113 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Devil's Advocate: Many pirates would have not paid for access to that media so to say it takes away from the creators profit isn't exactly true since one act of piracy does not equal one lost sale.

Devil's Advocate Part II: There is s significant amount of research that supports the notion that pirates actually spend more money on media than the average person.

I personally am an example of part II. I pirate a lot of music but I refuse to use Spotify because of how little it pays artists and I have also spent significant amounts of money buying music from artists I enjoy via Bandcamp or buying from the artist directly because I know they get a bigger cut of the profits that way.

[-] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 59 points 3 weeks ago

Ironically, piracy develops more ethical consumers

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 34 points 3 weeks ago

Because people don't want to pay for shit content. Let's take pirating out of the equation. If I read a book I borrowed and I really like it, I would buy. If the content was trash then I wouldn't. Same goes if I watch a movie, listen to an album, or eat a microwavable burrito at a friend's or family member's house.

[-] blaze@programming.dev 14 points 3 weeks ago

This is what I do. I don't want to get burned by a shitty product.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ditto on Spotify. I have big love for piracy of FLAC for my personal music server, but I also have a decent rack filled with physical offerings from my favorite bands.

My Bandcamp collection is also getting up there, since a few of my favs say they are treated well there, and it's FLAC friendly as well.

Physical media or merch directly from the band is absolutely the way to go every time if possible.

[-] SnotFlickerman 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm having trouble finding a link to substantiate it, but I remember in the early 2000's a group of artists having to sue their record labels because of the lawsuits on file-sharing users. The record labels said they were doing it for the artists, but the artists had to sue the record labels to even ever see a penny from the fruits of those lawsuits. The record labels were just pocketing the money for themselves while saying it was "for the artists."

Anyway, long story short is that kind of behavior from the recording industry made me want to give money directly to the artists and cut out these selfish middlemen who did nothing but claimed all the profits.