423
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Dents and scratches are not part of "using a car"

[-] cadekat@pawb.social 31 points 1 month ago

I see you have never driven behind a pickup truck on a gravel road.

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

If you're close enough to another vehicle on a gravel road that you're getting stones flicked up, there's no way that's a safe following distance, especially considering the increased stopping distances.

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

gravel travels fairly far when the vehicles are going 50 mph

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Vehicles also skid very far at that speed.

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Your safe following distance on gravel at 50mph is more than that. 3 seconds is your minimum following distances on normal surfaces (used to be 2, advice has changed), you should have a 4 second following distance on gravel. https://www.drive-safely.net/safe-following-distance/

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you're going 50mph on a gravel road, you are fucking up.

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

if the government doesn't want me going 50 they wouldn't have set the speed limit to 45

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

It's easy to armchair quarterback when you have the benefit of hindsight.

Go ride a motorcycle and then come back and tell us how many pebbles got enough in your direction, despite following at safe distances. I can assure you that you will be very surprised.

[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

I have had nicks in my windshield due to gravel thrown up by vehicles traveling in the opposite direction.

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Have you tried not doing that?

It's really as easy as not doing that.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

You don't even have to be on a gravel road. My van's windshield got cracked the other day simply from a pebble getting kicked up from a passing car.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have actually, for several years of my life, which is how I know it doesn't cause that.

E: downvote this comment if you have never driven on a gravel road.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

You've driven on a gravel road behind other cars and never had a windshield crack? Not even a rock chip?

Now I know you're full of shit.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Now I know you're full of shit.

[-] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Not you again. Yesterday you were annoying people about trump.

Immediate downvote.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I tend to "annoy" people about fascist dictators frequently but it's nice to know you have no counterargument and you downvote based on hate instead of the content of the comment itself.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A pebble flung up from a passing car cracked my van's windshield the other day.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

And I suppose you expect Hertz to eat the cost of replacing the windshield?

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Windshields crack sometimes. Tough titties. It's a giant pane of fragile glass exposed to the elements.

If it's clearly not malicious, then yes, they should suck it up and pay for it. That's cost of doing business.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

LOL I don't even know what to say to that. "Tough titties" indeed. You're the one responsible for anything that should happens to the vehicle while it's in your possession, even if it's not entirely or even partly your fault.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

And what if the windshield cracks due to temperature fluctuations? It happens. And on a rental car? Not my problem.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Then that would be a warranty issue. But good luck proving that.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Normal wear and tear isn't the renter's problem in any way, shape, or form; and that includes dings and scratches on the paint, wheels, glass, and interior, simply from everyday use and being exposed to the elements. Anything outside of unreasonably extreme damage is entirely on the rental company simply for the fact that they are the ones who own the car. This is part of why I will never use my vehicle for anything outside personal usage.

I, and thousands of other customers every single day, already pay over $500 (or much, much more) just for the privilege of being given the keys to a new-ish vehicle for 3 days. On top of whatever other bullshit they try to tack on. Where the fuck do you think that money goes? I've never even had a car payment that high.

Given that price, I expect the vehicle to be clean, properly maintained (they get the bare minimum, btw, I've witnessed this firsthand from the shop side; they won't even replace wiper blades unless a customer brings it up), and every single square inch to be inspected and documented, with "wear and tear" clearly defined in customer-friendly terms - none of this bullshit "redefining of commonly-accepted terms" that every corporation seems to be jerking it to these days.

Cars are not investments; they never have been. A car is a highly-complex machine - a tool that can serve multiple purposes. These, like any other highly-complex machine, requires regular maintenance, inspection, and repair. Some things are merely cosmetic, but others can become safety issues - such as a cracked windshield. And yet rental companies, like every other company, are charging more and more for less and less. What exactly are they doing with that money if the customers are the ones being charged for issues that aren't even getting fixed?

Why?

Because "line must go up".

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Normal wear and tear isn't the renter's problem in any way, shape, or form

Which is why I said it's a warranty issue.

and that includes dings and scratches on the paint, wheels, glass, and interior, simply from everyday use and being exposed to the elements.

We're going around in circles here: dings and scratches are not caused by normal use.

already pay over $500

rental companies, like every other company, are charging more and more for less and less

The price of the rental and the responsibility of the renter are different problems. If you think you can do it for cheaper, give it a shot. You can list your car on Turo and make a fortune undercutting these terrible companies.

I've never even had a car payment that high.

There's a myriad of expenses in rental that are not incurred by simply owning a personal vehicle (you've already listed a bunch of them), and a profit margin on top, so that makes a ton of sense.

What exactly are they doing with that money if the customers are the ones being charged for issues that aren't even getting fixed?

What makes you think they're not being fixed? Even if they're not, those issues decrease the resale value of the vehicle.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
423 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73792 readers
3365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS