42
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)
Science
5045 readers
357 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Nowhere is it stated how efficient either material is, other than to say that the researchers are 5-10 years away from a material that's 10% efficient. So they must have an efficiency of less than that I guess.
From the paper, the closest I can see is:
I don't know how representative that measurement is though.
Good question.
The paper's PDF give clearer, less click-baity information on efficiency:
A 8x increase is good progress for that specific technique, but 0.47% is very low efficiency. There's still ways to go.