449

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/5259804

Oh my fucking god lmaooo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

We had two choices:
A. genocide (with a slight chance to stop it).
B. genocide (with a strong chance for authoritarianism).

Unfortunately (thanks in part to misinformation like yours) we got choice B. So shut the fuck up.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The point they were making was that this woman should still have been in the streets protesting genocide regardless of the sitting president. They are calling the complicity of this womans desire for inaction disgusting and it should be viewed that way. Getting your genocidal fuck in office does not absolve you of responsibility, if anything you should demand more from them. Going back to brunch means being comfortable with the crimes of your empire just because you aren't threatened by them at that moment.

[-] SattaRIP 16 points 1 month ago

So you do know you have very few choices. How astute of you! Did you figure that out all on your own?

This is what you call a democracy? No anti-genocide choice, so just move on and normalize atrocities until the fascists kill you too. I'm never gonna look at the democrats as being separate from the Republicans again, because theyre not. They meet halfway with genocide when there should be none!

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately (thanks to living in a shithole) there’s no anti-genocide choice

[-] mathemachristian 9 points 1 month ago

from https://citationsneeded.medium.com/news-brief-us-media-top-dems-assist-trump-and-israels-unprovoked-attack-on-iran-d391810dc29b

And what the 2024 nominee, Kamala Harris, who, you know, the presumptive or leading nominee for 2028, she’s she signaled she’s going to run again. One would be curious what she would say about this. She has not commented. She lost the election about seven months ago. Has not commented at all on Gaza, except twice to hand-wring about Israeli hostages. She’s not opposed anything Trump has done with respect to the genocide in Gaza, not publicly at least. She hasn’t publicly condemned anything that Trump has done with respect to Iran. And the bombing happened last night. Since then, she hasn’t issued a statement. She hasn’t condemned it. She hasn’t opposed it. Now, a lot of people say, Oh, well, Harris would have been better than Trump. Again, very possible, but the one person in the world who could solve this mystery, which is Kamala Harris herself, has yet to criticize Trump on the subject of Israel at all.

[-] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 6 points 1 month ago

It was bound to happen that the worst of the worse would won. Since american been fine with a teo party system for centuries

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
449 points (100.0% liked)

The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk

200 readers
172 users here now

Dunking on Liberals from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Dems keep working with trump to approve his picks, but what they won't accept is that if you sit down at a table with nazis, the only thing that's changed is the number of nazis at the table. @_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules:

We allow posts about liberal behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion.

Sister community: !tankiejerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Inspired by !tankiejerk@lemmy.world

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS