154
submitted 1 year ago by DeadWorld@lemm.ee to c/brainworms@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Sets a precedent though, and implies that the card companies are responsible for what people buy. First it’s drugs, then it’s porn, liquor, gender affirming items and hormones, contraceptives, or whatever else the fascists don’t like. Companies won’t want to be fined by the fascist right once they start pushing to ban things.

[-] Rom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Mastercard is adhering to federal laws, not taking a moral stand. Credit card companies aren't obligated to facilitate illegal transactions. If they were banning something whose sale was completely legal, there would be a argument to be made here, but that's not what's happening. They aren't going to go after porn, liquor, gender affirming items, hormones, or contraceptives, unless some fascists ban them, at which point it's not the credit card companies restricting you, it's the fascists. Go after the fascists.

[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

What federal law are they adhering to? Mastercard isn’t buying the drugs they are denying a person access to the funds that that person already owns. Mastercard should be agnostic to what the person uses that money for.

It sets a precedent that card companies are responsible for what their client’s purchase, and can reject transactions based on what their clients are purchasing, not how much money/credit they have.

I can go after corporate shitheads and fascists especially when they are holding each other’s cocks.

[-] Rom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact that marijuana is still federally classified as a Schedule I drug. Why would you think credit card companies should allow cardholders to make illegal transactions using their credit cards? Do you think they'd be okay with people using their credit cards to purchase child pornography? Or hitmen? Trafficked persons? What about 100 kilos of cocaine? I'm aware marijuana isn't as bad as any of those things, and it's way past time for the laws to be updated, but the fact remains it's still against the law to purchase it. To argue they have no obligation to make sure they aren't facilitating in illegal actions is absurd. As far as I know they've never allowed illegal transactions to be made, so absolutely no precedent is being set here.

[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Why should I care what a person is buying? So what if they are buying hitmen or 100 kilos of cocaine? If and when they get caught they will go to prison. It’s not Mastercard’s job to police the system.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
154 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1214 readers
83 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS