301
Social Media 'Likes' Serve as Online Piracy Evidence, Judge Concludes
(torrentfreak.com)
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
![]() |
![]() |
---|---|
Ko-fi | Liberapay |
It's not very difficult to parse through database data for specific usernames and comments/upvotes related to that.
A determined judge would just make you pay for the time it takes to do so.
There must still be some way to defend oneself against oppressive authorities in such way it doesn't cause problems to yourself. Though on second thought it might not be good idea to post detailed ideas on public spaces where those hypothetical authorities can also read them. Its like we are living in beginning of boring cyberpunk dystopia.
Rule #1 of the internet: If you post it on the internet, it'll never go away. Like Joel Michael Singer
well, the degree of that is also up to other people and how much effort they want to go through
Not wrong, but still.