77
submitted 23 hours ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/entertainment@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 15 hours ago

It's weird to me that at some point since elementary school, "sneak" became a weak verb. We used "snuck" in such a case. "Snook" was also an option in other cases, but now it's "all sneaked, all the time."

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 14 hours ago

Hm, good point. I generally go on feeling, from an English as an Nth Language point of view... and my subjective feeling is that "snuck" has more of a "participle" meaning, while "sneaked" has more of a "past tense" meaning.

According to AI Overview, there might also be some EN-US vs EN-GB at play:

"Snuck" is an irregular past tense: It's an alternative form that has gained widespread acceptance, especially in North American English.

"Snuck" is sometimes considered nonstandard in British English: While it's increasingly common in British English, it's still often seen as nonstandard in formal writing.

That would match the Wiktionary entry: https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/sneaked

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 8 hours ago

I WAS JUST THINKING ABOUT THIS EARLIER.

Specifically, (as a native English speaker) my gut is to do the same thing (participle vs. past-simple) with irregular verbs such as this (others being dealt, learnt, spelt, etc.).

I couldn't sworn I read something about that usage when I was a teenager but everything I look up regarding them, now, chalks them up to being just an EN-US and EN-GB difference but, otherwise, entirely equivalent.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Entertainment

4675 readers
123 users here now

Movies, television and Broadway.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS