1515

Source (Threads)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ravelin@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 year ago

I know a university professor who has had this kind of interaction with a student who claimed that they had graded an exam wrongly because ChatGPT gave a different answer. The STUDENT called the PROFESSOR a liar because AI gave a different answer...

[-] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago

When I was in school I called my teachers liars/misinformed/uninformed all the time. I just didn't have chatgpt to summarize why, so I actually had to read a book if I wanted to make that claim and back it up. There's nothing wrong with disagreeing with your professor, you shouldn't trust anything that anyone says blindly, ESPECIALLY FUCKING CHATGPT

[-] ravelin@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with your professor using credible sources

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Oh boy. Ohhhhhh boy.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

Professors being wrong happens all the time.

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but AI is not a reliable source for that assertion.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

No source is reliable, that's the point.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1515 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7136 readers
888 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS