1473

Source (Threads)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 125 points 4 days ago

If you want a bunch of data no one else has, you’re entitled to charge for it. From looking at their site, they’re a historical/statistical map provider which is data that you won’t find through Google/Apple/OSM’s public data.

[-] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 46 points 4 days ago

Another modern example, back country and overlanding routes. There's a decent amount of work and danger that goes into it, and not enough public interest for the big dogs to warrant mapping out the paths-less-traveled.

I get GPX routes and roll maps from TAT and BDR because these trails are not even on OpenStreetMaps.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago
[-] wigit@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

And once you're done with or bored of TAT, you can go to Europe and ride the TET. https://transeurotrail.org/

[-] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Indeed, it is! I've not done the entire red route in one go yet, but I've done several different pieces of it from VA to UT.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 24 points 4 days ago

Yes, there's some old stuff archived out there for free, but it's very limited and hit or miss. People who have collected a decent digital archive of things you would have found in a library decades ago deserve to make some money for their service.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Worth noting that OpenHistoricalMap does exist: https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

Entirely plausible and even probable, though, that a commercial site has more historical map data than OHM does.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1473 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2771 readers
791 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS