191
submitted 2 months ago by Dadifer@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sturger@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Every time I see these “We’ll do X in/around the ocean” projects I think, “These people have not spent a lot of time near the ocean.”

[-] Dryfire@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

There are 2000 year old Roman concrete piers that are still just hanging out in sea water. So it's possible if you find the right mix.

[-] sturger@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

The concrete isn’t the problem. Like mentioned above, the sealife growth is. Also, metal and moving mechanicals are savaged by seawater (and the sealife growth). Keeping things working on the surface of the water is difficult and expensive. Water pressure makes that even worse. Maintenance requires divers which are likewise very expensive.

[-] Dryfire@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Really good points. I was only thinking of the structure of the concrete... Sea life growth is a whole other ball game!

this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

science

20389 readers
477 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS