1016
History Shmistory
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1016 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
8000 readers
2309 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To be fair, in 1930 people had little education and no internet. Today you don't need to remember to understand what's wrong with tariffs.
Let me tell you a little something about ✨declining media literacy✨
You can leave out "media".
There were radio, televisions, and books. And while people had overall poor quality of education back then because of lack of access, Noam Chomsky mentioned people still try to educate themselves through reading.
The problem then and now is that mass communication is used by bad faith actors to emotionally manipulate the public into voting against their own interests. Back then, yellow journalism riled up jingoism. Goebbels and the Nazis saw potential use of radio for mass indoctrination, and made conscious effort to make radio cheaper and widely available in Germany.
The modern economic theory is too young for that to matter, and it also includes many lessons we've learnt since 1930s.
Not sure what you mean, but communication itself and its effect on human culture does not change, no matter the media. You can draw a painting to de-humanise and incite hatred towards a group, or you can go on radio and incite hatred towards a group. Either way, both methods can be used to incite hatred.
Sorry I forgot to address this.
Correct me if I am wrong but I don't see how we learnt since. As we speak, a used to be unknown far-right party gained massive electoral votes in Romania. It turns out that they have been making their presence in social media, where older establishment politicians have no familiarity with. The bigger lesson that democratic and liberal forces should do is knowing to use new forms of media instead. Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Obama knew this very well.
It is baffling to me that Waltz wasn't on literally every brolosopher podcast the moment he was tapped. He should've been on Rogan lecturing people about what it means to be a man. Talking about how his empathy and responsibility shine through in how he governs, with programs like free school lunches. He should have gone on Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson’s show and called them weird to their faces.
Am I talking to a chatbot?