1149
Programmers then and now
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1149 points (100.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
25518 readers
2160 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If using plain CSS, usually it's enough to set
widthappropriately, andmargin-leftandmargin-righttoauto.If using a Modern Frontend/CSS Framework, then may God have mercy on your poor soul.
(Seriously I just started a new project with TailwindCSS and I'm so confused. But not entirely desperate yet.)
So what is the point of these frameworks if they make it harder?
If you spend a lot of time on a single framework, you will transcend and become a sort of frontend diety, growing multiple extra limbs allowing you to type in CSS classes faster than any mere mortal
Until everyone moves over to the next thing and you start from 0 again. Web dev is a nightmare.
This is a bit of a stretch I think..
Web development is complicated because it's indredibly poorly "designed" from the beginning, and doing a full redo is impossible.
It is 100x easier today than it was in 2006 when I started.
Generally I find many these frameworks will make some complicated things simple, but the cost is some things that were once simple are now complicated. They can be great if you just need the things they simplify - or in other words can stick to what they were intended for, but my favorite way of keeping things simple is to avoid using complicated and heavy frameworks.
w-... mx-auto, replace the 3 dots with your desired width value, and that's it with tailwindI'm doing a small hobby project (a ladder/ranking system for playing beer sports with my community), and I tried out Tailwind.
I gave up and loaded Bootstrap instead, but I will probably end up just writing all the CSS myself.
Seems so silly to have 15 CSS classes on a single DOM element..
Who’s saying you’re using the frameworks correctly?
Kidding aside, I think the popular frameworks these days are incredibly well made. Frontend web has always been hell, and if your job is producing functional web GUIs, you can't do it on a large scale without them.
Well, I find bootstrap very intuitive, and I don’t have 15 classes on my elements. That’s why I was asking.
Why is that silly? As long as the classes follow a strict naming scheme & have useful abstractions, that seems much better than having to give every node a unique class name that doesn't necessarily have much meaning. I can't count the number of "container" and "wrapper" and "content" classes I've seen & written, where the names don't describe anything useful.
My brother in Christ TailwindCSS just gives classes that let you do inline styling in a shorter syntax! (and theme configuration, but mostly inline styling)
Replace
width: ...pxwithw-...,margin-left: ...withml-...andmargin-right: ...withmr-.... Setting both horizontal margins ismx-...and both vertical margins ismy-....If you can do inline styling, TW just makes the syntax a bit shorter, but that's it, really.