397
Supreme Court allows Trump to implement transgender military ban
(www.nbcnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
397 points (100.0% liked)
News
31426 readers
2953 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gender fraud, seriously? What’s wrong with these people?
Have they improved their electric and other utilities so that they don't collapse in the slightest breeze? Or are they still doing stuff like this as a distraction
Disgusting. I hate this timeline.
They are a transphobe. Even tagged then as such the previous time they tried to pass off their hate as "just stuff everyone knows is true".
I wouldn't bother.
Edited to add: Yeah, see reply, they just keep going. "If being transphobic makes me a transphobe then words have lost meaning" is... Well, something.
Tag accuracy confirmed!
There could, in fact, not be the category of trans if there was no gender binary. Without the moon, no cis- and translunar orbits. A boundary has to exist before it is possible to cross it or, indeed, stay within it.
That boundary is a quite bit fuzzy because gender is a bimodal distribution: Two bell curves which meet in the middle. But it clearly is there, those two humps clearly exist, they may apply to no individual but they apply, statistically, to the population as a whole, and as we're individuals and not statistics where shit gets stupid is when people are saying "you're on that side of the graph in aspect X, therefore you must be on the same side in aspect Y": It's trying to enforce a strict boundary when things are, well, fuzzy. Multi-dimensional, at the very least. There's women with beards and men who can give birth. There always have been, and if that scares you then you should learn to live and let live.
That's not even covering karyotypes, much less phenotypes. Read up on the actual biology before making BS claims like that.
Schizophyllum commune has over 20k sexes.
As to humans: You could have googled karyotype and understood that there's things like XXY, you could have googled phenotype and understood that you can have a XY karyotype and still a female phenotype.
This is all massively more complex and diverse than you think it is I've not even scratched the tip of the iceberg here.
It's meaningless to you because you choose not to give it meaning, it has a very obvious, static meaning to people who live in reality.
It's true that some people over-use those terms, but that doesn't make them untrue accusations every time. Like this time for instance!
Sure!
No, just uninterested in participating in your fun little games ;)
It's not saying "gender dysphoria is not a diagnosis that exists anywhere" it's saying "believing yourself to be transgender is a substantial enough mental illness and flaw in character so as to preclude military service."
This claims that having gender dysphoria is some sort of deficiency, and not just a non-standard identifier. This invalidates the identity of trans people, and calls into question their legitimacy.
https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03817I.htm
This isn't happening in a vacuum.
Bull. Shit.
You're gonna ignore all the other anti "dei" stuff being done? Pretend like this is just off in the corner all alone?
You're full of shit. We're done. I won't hit my head against a wall.
First of all, DEI includes things like posting job offerings in spaces that are frequented by lower income or minority populations. It's rejection includes an assumption that the most qualified person for any given position is a white straight man.
People in this Admin have called the former secretary of defense a DEI hire. She was a Black General.
This admin has consistently called any minority a DEI hire and has tried to blame accidents on said "DEI" hires.
I don't see it as an insult, it is used as one. Especially by this admin.
It's the idea that some is only there because of DEI and without it, their capabilities wouldn't have been enough. Which is wrong.
Before DEIA was implemented, minorities were often not hired, because of their background, even though they were the more capable candidate. And this admin is a perfect example, that "DEI hire"" is projection.
Is Hegseth more capable than his predecessor? Gods no. His signal escapades are enough to prove this.
Is RKJ more capable than his predecessor? Is anyone in this majority white, majority male admin better suited for their job than the more diverse admin before it? No. But still, that admin gets labeled as DEI Hires, not because anyone could prove that DEI prevented a more deserving candidate from filling that position, but because they belong to minorities.
This EO fits into a larger pattern of targeting minorities under the banner of "fixing DEI". The original point of your argument, however, was that this admin does not try to erase trans people.
"The left-wing gender insanity being pushed at our children is an act of child abuse. Very simple. Here’s my plan to stop the chemical, physical and emotional mutilation of our youth,” Trump said about Trans Kids.
Sec. 2. Policy and Definitions. It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.
This entire EO he put out on Day one is entirely about erasing trans people without even mentioning them as "trans". Kicking them out of the military is another step towards this goal of ultimately banning them from every facet of life.
You are either missing the point or are willfully obtuse.