173
submitted 3 months ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] giddy@aussie.zone 10 points 3 months ago

MOZILLA could be doomed. Firefox? Not so much

[-] Majestic@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 months ago

Literally the other way around.

Mozilla can continue to be an irrelevant little NGO with a tiny little office in SF pestering people and shouting into the void and setting up booths at tech conventions on very, very, very little money. A few million a year, much less than they stand to be able to earn from their investment fund returns annually.

Firefox on the other hand requires Mozilla's hundreds of paid full time developers. Its codebase is nearly the size of Linux, as a browser it's constantly patching security issues, adding in new features, fixing things that break for small amounts of the web, etc.

There is simply no organization waiting in the wings that has the money and the interest in making a privacy-preserving web-browser that can just pick up that slack.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

They provide like 99+% of the development work. You won't easily replace that with volunteers.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
173 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

20572 readers
90 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS