243
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Look, I'm going to be honest, if a Progressive or Democrat on the campaign trail says they would use all of the powers granted to trump against all Republicans in a goose and gander situation, they'd have my vote.

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

“All billionaires will be summarily executed and their assets will be distributed to the citizenry, and the Heritage Foundation will be declared a terrorist organization, and all current and past leaders, funders, employees, and judges endorsed by them will be immediately sent to a prison camp in El Salvador” seems like a winning message.

And anything the president wants only needs an executive order, it seems, so it should be pretty easy to implement.

[-] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not about revenge, I'm about making the world a better place for everyone, even the people who want to make it a worse place.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good for you. I am and I also think using the powers Trump has been given effectively would make the entire world a better place.

[-] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Do you think that will make it better or worse? Cause you know it's going to swing back the other way at some point, and as aggro as they already are toward the left, can you imagine how they will react when they have legitimate reasons to think they're being targeted?

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Well I suppose between using the DOJ to prosecute "criminals", prevent Republican firms from practicing law in federal courts, arresting Republican judges including the SC, and following through with Trump's "homegrows" plan, I guess I'm not seeing a problem.

But I'd settle for taxing the living fuck out of conservative churches and other non-profits that violate not staying out of politics.

For now.

[-] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

It smacks of accelerationism. 'Fuck with those who fucked with us' just results in a whole lot of people getting fucked, only substitute targeted, arrested, renditioned, etc for 'fucked'.

But I’d settle for taxing the living fuck out of conservative churches and other non-profits that violate not staying out of politics.

Fuckin' same.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
243 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23300 readers
2802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS