573

Source (Via Xcancel)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] falcunculus@jlai.lu 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A big issue with AI is precisely how just a few people can inundate the rest of us with their mass-produced slurry of AI content.

[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just like photography did once remove the painter from making a selfie 🤷🏼 The tools are not the problem, it’s the users that think they should put everything online as if it is a big achievement.

[-] falcunculus@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, I agree. OK, now let's say 99% of users online agree that low quality content shouldn't be posted online. And then imagine there is some kind of technology that allows the 1% of "bad users" (the ones who don't care about low quality) to upload a thousand times more than other users can. It would follow that 90% of content online would be from these users that only represent 1% of the population. Do you see the problem?

[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Pinterest was already a sinkhole, best to be avoided. My problem is de statement that the OP made. AI isn’t the problem, its the people that think their rubbish is great and push it into our face so to speak. If someone builds a crappy shed, we can blame the hammer but in reality it is the self-appointed carpenter that created the mess.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 2 days ago

What is your genius solution to handle these naughty users, then?

If you fail to respond within 3 business days, we will continue with our plan to nuke OpenAI from orbit.

[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Where did I say I have a solution… I know at least one thing, and that is that blaming AI for this definitely wont solve anything.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 2 days ago

But removing AI would solve something, eh? Seems more effective than yours, then.

[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I guess removing hammers will do away with poorly built sheds as well. Good idea, let’s do it, removing all tooling in the world that might have a sub-optimal result.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 1 day ago

No, there's no need for that. I don't see how banning hammers would help with Internet spam—just the AI will do.

You can't catch me in a logical trap here, hoefnix, because there isn't one. I'm mom saying you aren't allowed to play with silly string in the house; it's too much to clean up.

[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah, your lack of capability to understand a hyperbole explains a lot. I’m dad here saying, if you want to learn you have to practice, just don’t bother people with the results until they’re worthwhile.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 1 day ago
[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Are you this daft or just pulling my leg?

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 1 day ago

I choose "daft." Now explain.

[-] hoefnix@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

What do I need to explain, and if I do will you be able to understand? Think I will pass on this one.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
573 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2586 readers
855 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS