What are you going on about? You're not reading what I said, and at this point this level of "ignorance" really seems deliberate and in bad faith.

Anarchy isn't "no regulations", it's "no hierarchies". Yes, "no regulations" is considerably easier to accomplish (temporarily) than "no hierarchies", but that's not what the word means. If you want to talk about unregulated capitalism, do so. There's nothing anarchic about it though. As you admit, capitalism spontaneously generates hierarchy in a vacuum.

"No hierarchies" is substantially more difficult to attain, but that's what the word means, and the synonym is communism. I'm not here, like you apparently are, to speak to the pragmatism of that ideology. I will repeat, slowly, since I've done so many times without your understanding and I wish to do so no longer:

COMMUNISM IS NOT STABLE IN THE PRESENT WORLD

THAT IS IRRELEVANT TO ITS DEFINITION

THE EXISTENCE OF AUTHORITY PRECLUDES COMMUNISM

IDEOLOGIES WITH AUTHORITY ARE NOT COMMUNISM

MANY AUTHORITIES HAVE CLAIMED TO BE COMMUNISM

THEY ARE LYING, IT IS A CONTRACTION

I'm not going to keep saying the same thing. I'm done. Either you can't read or you're trolling, deliberately misunderstanding in bad faith. Reread my statements. I thought my last post quite deftly cut to the heart of it, you keep taking past me to a conversation I'm not having. You're taking to yourself, or a ghost of the conversation you think you're having, or there's an inefficiency in translation.

Review my posts. I'm done. Das Gespräch ist kaputt. There is no continuation.