754
Just a friendly reminder
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
754 points (100.0% liked)
Flippanarchy
988 readers
28 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
That's true, some people repeat the same points for free. This is also bad, it leads to bad outcomes.
100+ years of electoralism and you ended up in fascism anyway. Talk about bad outcomes.
Fascism, the ultimate form of antielectoralism, is winning, yes. And instead of fighting it, the most passionate groups of left-leaning people are obsessed with not doing the bare minimum to stop it.
Electoralism doesn't stop fascism whatsoever.
Democracy works for whoever uses it. If you don't use it, if you only let the worst parts of your country to use it, you get your electoralism.
There is an alternative explanation to all of it, progressives being a small minority will also explain the situation.
I let you to decide which is worse.
The degree to which liberal democracy 'works' is dependent on the health of capital
The more capital fails, the greater chance democracy slips into populism because capital can no longer address the needs of the people and sustain its infinite growth. Populism either leans left (redistribution of capital towards labor) or it leans right (consolidation of capital toward an 'in' group to the exclusion of the out groups), but once capital has failed there's really no returning to liberal democracy*.
*edit - until capital re-balances, but will trend toward collapse again
in particular, it seems to work for whomever can get their districts more successfully gerrymandered.
Nobody said it's going to be easy. But if you give up on democracy because of the gerrymandrting, you can stop worrying about politics, everything else is so much harder, every other action is so much more impossible, you might as well give up now.
i have given up on democrcy, but i havent given up on change...
You didn't do the moderately easy thing so you can try your hands on the impossible one. Which means you either gave up on thinking or on telling the truth.
who said i didnt do democracy, i did democracy while i could still pretend it was effective. dont go around putting words in my mouth and actions in my hand, patriot. you wanna waste your time huffing copium pretending the obviously rigged system totally works thats for you bud. take that shit it and sell it up the river, im gonna go ahead and believe my lying fucking eyes.
what makes you think next midterm will even be legitimate in the pretend sense i just referred to anyway. what makes you think you could vote for someone who could possibly fix any of this even if we were playing pretend- what would 'fixing all this' even look like. what makes you think the democratic majority arent already pleased with whats happening. grow a set of eyeballs and unblink for half a fucking minute dude fr
Pretty much. The left can’t be bothered by pragmatism and is blinded by perfectionism. It boggles my mind how the political side who should be the go to for most of the population can’t make politics.
"the left"- you have no idea what is left or right. The left maybe have two proponents in the entirety of government.
Edit: or->is
Maybe not voting hurts the chances of not having more proponents in government. Think we found the problem.
Nah couldn’t be, everyone should just let the fascist elect themselves and then cry about fascism.
Y'all implying I didn't vote? You're fucking delusional!
I voted blue straight down the line in a very very red state knowing where our electoral votes would fall.
Not you personally, but a lot of people that are less right than republicans didn’t show up so trump won.
That's absolutely true. I was holding onto some small glimmer of hope that my state might send it's 3 votes her way, but no. Went 2-1 for shitler.