544
Current method of Rule control
(files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
544 points (100.0% liked)
196
18143 readers
1657 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The biggest joke are people who care only about genitalia. As long as it is slick and there is some liquid it doesn't matter all that much what the other party has
Imagine being some kind of radical feminist lesbian sperging for hours about how men treat us as body parts and then see only vaginas and dicks. The irony
Are you having sex with a cut of meat or a person.
Hence why bisexuality and pansexuality will always reign supreme over all the squabbles. Might have to make a tier list
The thing is sexuality is a continuous spectrum (0,1). Using advanced mathematical apparatus we can prove that every single person is bisexual. That's why mathematics is fundamentally gay
Moreover we must consider intersex people. What if their stuff is 20% dick and 80% vagina?
No.
You just say: I don’t wan to have sex with you.
You don’t need to explain yourself, like a wimp, or go into muddy waters of stupid definitions
I have a feeling you dislike me for some reason so I am gonna skip this dialogue
No I was just joking and you keep taking me serious for some reason, I was responding to a joke of yours after all
If they are attracted to women with male genitalia exclusively they are called chasers so why would the other way around be any different? Genitalia fetishism is always a bit disgustingly reductive
You will only avoid all this unnecessary garbage if you do not try to categorise these things in artificial labels and just have sex with who you want. If two people want to fuck then they do it and there is no need to call it a mouthful
Otherwise you get monstrosities like ‚I am only attracted to white boys below 5’10 during blue moon. I call it xyzuality’ just shut up already and keep sucking
"Oh I like you I am also abcdsexual with vagina preference hihi" like shut the f up and get on your knees
The last line has so many words I do not know.
However, since you distinguish sexual interests from romantic ones in some cases, I wonder where for example "panromantic" or "biromantic" would be on your tier list. Similarly homosexuality is not distniguished from homoromanticism etc..
Nevermind though, in case it wasn't your intention to create a more or less "complete" picture.
It was just a joke of course I mean cmon. Tier list of sexualities is hilarious and a bit of a jab at society
I see, okay. Took it a bit too serious then. ;)
Cmon, my jokes are not even possible to be mistaken for alt right. I take special care to make them the least believable and absurd
Especially since the most common sexuality just...wasn't on the tier list at all. Not even marked as F tier or something.