1738

Mozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposal (github.com)

submitted 2 years ago by narwhal@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

204 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 years ago

Without video DRM those services don't work at all. It was necessary to keep users.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Without video DRM those services don’t work at all.

(x)

[-] wallmenis@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago

I think they meant it as a "necessary evil" because companies could start implementing their own drm and make everything more difficult to crack. Also without it, companies would not trust it without drm due to the greed.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Don't work at all" in Firefox, when Chrome implements the DRM the service insists upon and Firefox doesn't

and

"Don't work at all" because the services can't exist without DRM

are very different assertions.

I think you're (rightfully!) doubting the latter, but the person you replied to meant the former.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023

1738 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

20497 readers

17 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml