973
submitted 1 week ago by Duckxon@feddit.uk to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Not to defend Le Pen but barring opponents from elections is on page one of the fascist playbook.

[-] Robbity@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago

French courts are independent. She will appeal, and another court will condemn her and her friends in appeal.

The evidence is multitudinous and straightforward.

Countries that have special rules for powerful people are the fascist ones.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

No one in this thread is saying she shouldn't be punished for her crimes.

[-] Cliff@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

She got convicted of embezzlement of public money. By a court. Not by another political party.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Yep but that's what Putin also says before throwing people in jail.

Courts can be corrupted and if that happens, an open election is the last chance before full dictatorship ensues.

[-] Zentron@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

Bro, are you fighting this with whataboutism and false equivalency ? Troll detected opinion rejected

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Fight the arguments instead if they are so lame.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

It's not whataboutism if it's on the same topic. I just raised a very real example where this is problematic.

In the near future, I bet we will see the same in America.

And what in this is false equivalency? We're talking about banning criminals from elections, right?

[-] Zentron@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Imma just point and laugh at you now cuz you are either dumb enough to beileve what you are saying or you are a troll

🫵😂

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago
[-] seejur@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

What you are suggesting is even more dangerous though. Law immunity for politicians is even worse

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

No I'm saying she should definitely be in jail but rhat shouldn't stop her from being in the election, if she wants.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

And your evidence for the bold claim that the French justice system has been corrupted enough to fabricate and enter false evidence and land a conviction?

What about evidence that french media freedoms have been suppressed so badly that every single news agency has been intimidated into not revealing leaked evidence of fabrication?

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

I never said it was corrupted. I said in general, courts van be corrupted. See the supreme court of the USA for a recent example.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ok, but in general so can any organisation/institution become corrupted. So can your local authority or the upper management of where you work or the local school board or the organisers of your favourite activity club.

Your statement is tantamount to saying "corruption exists and is bad". Well yeah, it has since people put a name to greed.

Its good to keep an eye out for it, but unless there's growing evidence for the case that French courts have been corrupted, like how there's now a mountain's worth for the US supreme court, then it's not being skeptical it's being very cynical.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago

Finally someone who actually wants a debate.

I agree that it's not a problem until it is a problem. I think we differ in the way we are vigilant about defending the core of democracy.

Open elections, free speech and free press are very important to defend, even if you happen to dislike the person in question. I'd rather defend free speech of a person I hate than slowly carving away at it, one "victory" at a time. If one person doesn't have free speech, there is no free speech left.

I see it the same with elections. If anyone can be barred from running in an election, the election isn't open anymore.

I don't see it as skeptical versus cynical. Maybe in your eyes. What I've seen lately though is that democracy can be over very quickly, or in a way that no one can stop, even if you can see the signs. Look at USA right now, it's been going down hill for a while now but most people are realizing too late to do anything.

I'm not here to discuss France or their politics because I know nothing about it, nor about Le Pen. People seem to go very much into "it's fine for now in France".

It's fine until it isn't.

[-] quack@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Holy mother of false equivalence.

So what’s the alternative then? Just let politicians get away with crimes and elect them anyway? Because that doesn’t seem to be going too well for the US.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

The alternative is to punish them like any other citizen: prison or fines. All I'm against is disallowing them to run in elections.

If the people still vote for a convict, obviously the system is broken and needs to be fixed.

[-] troglodyte_mignon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Except in her case, it’s been proved that she’s been embezzling. Your argument makes no sense, you’re comparing two completely different situations.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

I'm definitely not saying Le Pen is innocent.

Navalny was found guilty of multiple crimes. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/04/russian-court-extends-alexei-navalny-sentence-in-penal-colony

Being charged a criminal is subject to the court system and if that ever gets corrupted, democracy is over.

Many people here say that it's not the same in France; that the French court system has no evidence of corruption. I agree. I prefer to have laws in place before they are needed, rather than too late.

I guess Germany is fascist for banning the nazi party then? 🤔

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

It's problematic at least. The Communist party is also banned in Germany.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nazi Bar Argument.

If you just let a bunch of Mobsters and their blood money into the race, soon, the race will be taken over by them.

[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

No, I still think she should be in prison.

[-] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

"Being really well dressed and using style to win people over is in the fascist playbook as well. Therefore drag queens are fascist."
That's you. That's you right now.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
973 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45654 readers
2141 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS