596
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by zaxvenz@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.org

German media outlets Süddeutsche Zeitung, WDR, and NDR also cite the report, noting that Russian President Vladimir Putin appears intent on testing NATO’s Article 5 guarantees. The alliance’s mutual defence clause obliges member states to come to one another’s aid if attacked. The assessment suggests Putin may seek to challenge how seriously that commitment would be honoured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump might be an idiot, but he is not so much of an idiot to take on the entirety of Europe, who, likely when this happens will have new allies besides the US

[-] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 52 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think you understand that trump is not only dumb he is also a russian asset. Sure actual evidence is shaky but when there is someone squatting with their pants down, only an completely insane person would claim they are in the process of laying chicken eggs.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 2 weeks ago

A war between the US and Europe would drag in the rest of the world, nowadays that would end in planetary annihilation

If we keep it conventional, we could bring about a new dark age. It would have to go nuclear before we start wondering if the deep sea tube worms will survive. We can definitely end humanity unilaterally, we might need Russia's help to boil the oceans.

[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nuclear war would actually cool the oceans. All nuclear bombs combined contain about the same energy as Hurricane Katrina or a small supervolcano eruption. There would be a small fraction of a degree of temporary increase in global atmospheric temperatures, quickly overwhelmed by the nuclear winter as ash and dust in the upper atmosphere reduce global temperatures by several degrees for several years.

The only way I see humanity boiling the oceans is by deliberately releasing global-industrial quantities of super-effective greenhouse gases, actively designed to make the Earth as well-insulated as possible.

[-] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

Trump will do anything in the safety of his home if he feels like it benefits him. If it has no negative impact for him, he doesn't care. That's why he could start a war with anyone, because he wouldn't go to the front.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

Would he be doing that if he attempts to take Greenland?

[-] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure Trump would do what he is doing with Ukraine now, and what America has done in the past. Provide assistance for a massive cost.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

There's a chance Trump's successor as fuhrer will be more directly militaristic, but only a chance. Most likely, Putin is still expecting Europe to fold and submit this time he escalates. Probably because he's misread the complacency of the West over the past two decades as a weakness of personality.

likely when this happens will have new allies besides the US

Who are you thinking of? Canada's a "shoe in" if you'll take us, of course, but anyone else?

[-] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

we may actually see a change in status-quo when it comes to china, it is also possible that europe starts warming up more to india, indonesia, brazil and other lesser powers are relations with the US deteriorates, these are the ones i would put my money on when it comes to new allies

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm. Would that be politically viable? If they're coming to your rescue militarily the relationship has to be deeper than just trade.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Isn't Europes combined military budget halfway to the moon at this point? Last I heard 180 billion and climbing not including induvidual countries efforts. Missread is a bit of an understatement.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, even he has to know that if Europe does fight back (as you and me know it would) it will go poorly for him.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I absolutely believe he's that much of an idiot.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump might be an idiot, but he is not so much of an idiot

I'm gonna stop you right there. Every time we underestimate Trump he shows there is no low and/or stupidity he won't sink to. He's credibly accused of being a Russian asset and has done everything Putin could have possibly wanted in terms of weakening western power and alliances. In like 3 months. Do I think he'll attack the UK or something? No. But he may very well do everything possible to help Russia, including giving them weapons and hurting their enemies...

[-] ImNotThatPokable@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know... These last few years have led me to never underestimate stupidity. Not that I think this would happen, because I don't think Americans would allow that.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t think Americans would allow that.

What would they do to stop it?

[-] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Trump might be an idiot, but he is not so much of an idiot to take on the entirety of Europe

I don't think he'll have to. With Europe busy infighting and a war on the eastern border, he can snack up Greenland just as he's planning to. Nobody will do anything about it at that point.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
596 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

5466 readers
1287 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS